Research on concrete strength prediction based on attention mechanism and residual network
,
 
,
 
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Dehong Normal University, Dehong Prefecture, Yunnan Province, 678400, China
 
2
China University of Mining &Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
 
3
School of Emergency Management, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, Sichuan Province, China
 
4
Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, Yunnan Province, China
 
 
Submission date: 2025-09-17
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-03-27
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-06-14
 
 
Publication date: 2026-06-16
 
 
Corresponding author
Haikuan Wu   

Xihua university, 610039, Sichuan province, China
 
 
Cement Wapno Beton 30(5) 399-422 (2025)
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Accurately predicting the compressive strength of concrete is crucial for quality control and structural safety assessment in civil engineering. However, traditional machine learning methods often struggle to capture the complex nonlinear interactions and strong feature correlations inherent in concrete mix design, thereby limiting their predictive accuracy and generalization ability. To address these challenges, this study proposes a deep learning model [AM-ResNet] that combines attention mechanisms with residual networks. The residual architecture effectively mitigates the vanishing gradient problem in deep networks, while the attention mechanism enhances the ability to identify key influencing factors by dynamically assigning feature weights. The experiments utilized a standard concrete compressive strength dataset from the UCI Machine Learning Repository, which contains 1,030 samples and 8 input variables. The study conducted a comprehensive, multidimensional comparative analysis of Support Vector Regression [SVR], Random Forest, and Backpropagation Neural Network models. The proposed AM-ResNet model achieved a coefficient of determination [R²] of 0.790, a root mean square error [RMSE] of 3.21 MPa, and a root mean square percentage error [RMSPE] of 8.9 %. Over 92 % of the prediction errors fell within the ±10 MPa range, meeting typical engineering quality control standards. Under 20 % input noise, AM-ResNet still maintains an R² value of 0.674, with a performance decline of only 14.7 %, significantly outperforming baseline models. Using only 10 % of the training samples, its R² value reaches 0.621, demonstrating exceptional data efficiency. Five-fold cross-validation confirmed its stability and demonstrated the lowest variance [σ = 0.021]. The proposed AM-ResNet framework provides a robust, accurate, and interpretable solution for concrete strength prediction, holding great potential for applications in intelligent quality control and material design within the civil engineering field.
REFERENCES (30)
1.
H. Wu, et al., Research of the workability, mechanical and hydration mechanism of coal gangue-construction solid waste backfilling materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 408, 133833 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb....
 
2.
H. Wu, et al., Research on pore distribution and creep properties of recycled plastic concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 485, 141947 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb....
 
3.
M. Amar, Comparative use of different AI methods for the prediction of concrete compressive strength. Cleaner Mater. 15, 100299 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clem....
 
4.
W. Ben Chaabene, M. Flah, M.L. Nehdi, Machine learning prediction of mechanical properties of concrete: Critical review. Constr. Build. Mater. 260, 119889 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb....
 
5.
W. Zhang, D. Liu, K. Cao, Prediction of concrete compressive strength using support vector machine regression and non-destructive testing. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 21, e03416 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm....
 
6.
S. Kumar, et al., Prediction of compressive strength of high-volume fly ash self-compacting concrete with silica fume using machine learning techniques. Constr. Build. Mater. 438, 136933 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb....
 
7.
Y. Jiang, et al., Prediction of time-dependent concrete mechanical properties based on advanced deep learning models considering complex variables. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 21, e03629 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm....
 
8.
R.V. Muthurathinam, et al., Optimizing concrete compressive strength prediction with a deep forest model: an advanced machine learning approach. Matéria (Rio J.) 29(4) (2024). https://doi.org/10.1590/1517-7....
 
9.
Q. Lv, et al., Machine learning-based optimization of concrete strength using interpretable models. Mater. Today Commun. 47, 112872 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtco....
 
10.
W. Wang, et al., Prediction of Compressive Strength of Concrete Specimens Based on Interpretable Machine Learning. Materials 17(15), 17153661 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1715....
 
11.
N.-H. Nguyen, et al., Heuristic algorithm-based semi-empirical formulas for estimating the compressive strength of the normal and high performance concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 304, 124467 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb....
 
12.
S. Zheng, T. Hu, Y. Yu, Interpretable Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model for Concrete Cover Separation of FRP-Strengthened RC Beams. Materials 17(9), 17091957 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1709....
 
13.
B. Sun, et al., Prediction of compressive strength of concrete under various curing conditions: a comparison of machine learning models and empirical mathematical models. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 9(7), 262 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062....
 
14.
A.K. Sah, Y.M. Hong, Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Concrete Compressive Strength Prediction. Materials 17(9), 17092075 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1709....
 
15.
M. Hosseinzadeh, et al., Concrete strength and durability prediction through deep learning and artificial neural networks. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 18(10), 1540–1555 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709....
 
16.
F. Ahmad, et al., Machine learning-based Graphical User Interface for predicting high-performance concrete compressive strength: Comparative analysis of Gradient Boosting Machine, Random Forest, and Deep Neural Network Models. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 19(7), 1075–1090 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709....
 
17.
R. Wang, et al., Structural damage identification by using physics-guided residual neural networks. Eng. Struct. 318, 118703 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engs....
 
18.
Y. Sun, Z. Gu, S.B. Yang, Probing vision and language models for construction waste material recognition. Autom. Constr. 166, 105629 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autc....
 
19.
H. Li, et al., The local information extraction BFRC compressive strength prediction method via one-dimensional convolutional residual network. Mater. Today Commun. 39, 108834 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtco....
 
20.
V.S. Aswal, B.K. Singh, R. Maheshwari, Machine learning-based model for prediction of concrete strength. Multiscale Multidiscip. Model. Exp. Des. 8(1), 48 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41939....
 
21.
K. Cao-Van, et al., Prediction of heart failure using voting ensemble learning models and novel data normalization techniques. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 154 (2025). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5....
 
22.
M. Shantal, Z. Othman, A. Abu Bakar, Missing data imputation using correlation coefficient and min-max normalization weighting. Intell. Data Anal. 29(2), 372–384 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3233/IDA-23....
 
23.
H.X. Wu, et al., Facial expression recognition algorithm based on multi-attention mechanism. Int. J. Innov. Comput. Inf. Control 19(4), 1239–1250 (2023). http://doi.org/10.24507/ijicic....
 
24.
A.D. Raha, et al., Corrections to “Attention to Monkeypox: An Interpretable Monkeypox Detection Technique Using Attention Mechanism”. IEEE Access 12, 118937–118937 (2024). http://doi.org/10.1109/access.....
 
25.
G. Prashal, P. Sumathi, N.P. Padhy, Synchrosqueezed Transform Based Multicondense Residual Network for Ultra-Short-Term Solar Power Forecasting. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 21(2), 1489–1498 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.20....
 
26.
A. Noorizadegan, et al., Stable weight updating: A key to reliable PDE solutions using deep learning. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 168, 106439 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enga....
 
27.
M.A. Abbas, et al., Residual mechanical properties of high strength concrete BBR9 subjected to dynamic uniaxial compressive loading. Cem. Concr. Res. 180, 16 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemc....
 
28.
A.H. Shadiani, M.A. Shoorehdeli, Online Learning Approach Based on Recursive Formulation for Twin Support Vector Machine and Sparse Pinball Twin Support Vector Machine. Neural Process. Lett. 55(4), 5143–5165 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063....
 
29.
B. Liu, R. Mazumder, Randomization Can Reduce Both Bias and Variance: A Case Study in Random Forests. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 26, 1–49 (2025). https://jmlr.org/papers/v26/24....
 
30.
W. Cho, et al., FastLRNR and Sparse Physics Informed Backpropagation. Results Appl. Math. 25 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rina....
 
ISSN:1425-8129
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top